Read about our epigenetic microarray technology:

Epigenetic Microarrays

This cover-story in Nucleic Acids Research received extensive world-wide feedback and was one of the most downloaded NAR papers in 2006.


- Press release 13. Dec.06 -
Licencing agreement with Epigenomics.

Read about our study on epigenetic variation in the germline:

Epigenetic variation in the germline

This story in Am. J. Hum. Genet. was selected by Nature Reviews Genetics as a Reseaerch Highlight for 2006!.


Headlines by Fresh Content.net



Take our poll #1:
In what epigenetic services are you interested?



You are visitor #

Supplementary data to: Age-specific epigenetic drift in late-onset Alzheimer's disease

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in post-mortem brain samples and lymphocytes


In the following tables the methylation data from MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry experiments (Wang et al., 2008) are available. The graphs are in an Excel format.


Additional comments to this study:

Discriminant Analysis
Using Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA) and Diagonal Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (DQDA) we tried to verify our marker selection from the ROC curve model, resulting in a similar set of classification markers (see Supplementary Table). Intriguingly, when stratifying for potential sex effects within the LOAD group, a set of new CpG dinucleotides could be identified that was specific for the male cases. The comparison of male LOAD cases with male controls resulted in 7 significant CpG dinucleotides as discriminators of the disease, all within the DNMT1 promoter. We took the groups of cases and controls and build a classifier from them, using Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA) and Diagonal Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (DQDA). This approach finds a minimal set of CpG sites in the dataset from which one can build a classifier with the same predictive power, using forward step-wise variable selection (FSVS). That is, the output of the Discriminant Analysis is a set of CpG sites that optimally separate the dataset into LOAD cases and controls. DLDA and DQDA usually give different results; for example DLDA has a lower misclassification rate than DQDA, and hence it is recommended to use both approaches in combination to find interesting results. In case a combinations of CpG sites had missing values, we replaced the missing value with a value averaged across individuals (using the geometric mean) to avoid too many dropouts. This approach has the smallest impact on the results for up to 20% missing values. Intriguingly, when stratifying for potential sex effects within the LOAD group, a set of new CpG dinucleotides could be identified that was specific for the male cases. The comparison of male LOAD cases with male controls resulted in 7 significant CpG dinucleotides as discriminators of the disease, all within the DNMT1 promoter.

Supplementary web table 1: Combined Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA) and Diagonal Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (DQDA) identified several significantly discriminate CpG sites in LOAD brains.

Marker

AD brain group

Control brain group

Covariance structure

PSEN#19

0.01500

0.02300

0.00028

PSEN#10

0.18583

0.33390

0.03692

APOE 3’-CGI #11

0.83750

0.78800

0.01186

APOE#1

0.11657

0.53124

0.38061

HTATIP#16

0.69658

0.91953

0.07253

HTATIP#15

0.13104

0.16650

0.00375

APP#11

0.79983

0.84820

0.10358

TFAM#8

0.28103

0.65500

0.16522

Supplementary web table 2: Combined DQDA and DLDA (in brackets) analysis of the male subset of LOAD cases compared to the controls revealed a clustering of potential markers within the DNMT1 gene promoter.

Marker

AD brain group

Control brain group

Covariance structure

DNMT1 CpG#3

0.19833

0.22000

0.00015

DNMT1 CpG#4

0.19833

0.22000

0.00015

DNMT1 CpG#5

0.63961

(0.91004)

0.476986

(0.67644)

0.01714

(0.03242)

DNMT1 CpG#9

0.77076

0.85961

0.10258

DNMT1 CpG#10

2.20906

(2.20906)

1.59970

(1.59970)

0.18798

(0.15037)

DNMT1 CpG#12

0.27250

0.31750

0.00788

DNMT1 CpG#17

0.48848

0.56750

0.00308


Supplementary web table 3: Description of the DNA samples used (for more details see the manuscript supplement):

ID

Age

Sex

Diagnosis

Tissue

1

66

f

AD

Brain

2

67

f

AD

Brain

3

69

f

AD

Brain

4

63

m

AD

Brain

5

63

m

AD

Brain

6

81

f

AD

Brain

7

82

f

AD

Brain

8

83

f

AD

Brain

9

88

f

AD

Brain

10

89

f

AD

Brain

11

94

f

AD

Brain

12

94

f

AD

Brain

13

97

f

AD

Brain

14

80

m

AD

Brain

15

81

m

AD

Brain

16

83

m

AD

Brain

17

84

m

AD

Brain

18

87

m

AD

Brain

19

88

m

AD

Brain

20

90

m

AD

Brain

21

86

f

AD

Brain

22

79

m

AD

Brain

23

74

m

AD

Brain

24

74

m

AD

Brain

25

63

m

Control 1

Brain

26

84

f

Control 2

Brain

27

86

f

Control 3

Brain

28

89

f

Control 4

Brain

29

88

m

Control 5

Brain

30

92

f

Control 6

Brain

31

74

m

Control 7

Brain

32

74

f

Control 8

Brain

33

71

f

Control 9